New Working Practices: A Scientometric Review

Authors

  • Olugbenga Timo Oladinrin School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
  • Wadu Mesthrige Jayantha School of Property Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Tochukwu Moses School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/intrest.v15n1.8

Keywords:

CiteSpace, flexible working, new working practices, scientometric, United Kingdom

Abstract

Study on New Working Practices (NWPs), which is the subject of this review paper, has created a large body of literature. Studies in this research area are progressing quickly, and it is important to stay abreast of new trends and essential factors in the growth of mutual awareness. This study evaluates the global scientific output of New Working Practices (NWPs) research and explores their hotspots and frontiers from 1980 to 2018 (pre-COVID-19), using bibliometric methods. 850 relevant articles were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and analysed. Scientometric method and Citespace VI were used to analyse the bibliometric data. Reference citation and cocitation networks were plotted, while keywords were used to analyse the research hotspots and trends. There is a significant increase in the number of annual publications with time. The United Kingdom (UK) ranked highest in the countries with most publications, and the leading author is Friedhelm Nachreiner based on publication counts. The most cited author/organisation is the UK Department of Health. Performance, work, and flexible working are the research hotspots, while flexible working arrangement represents the prominent research domain. The study offers valuable references for researchers, industry practitioners and policymakers.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-23

How to Cite

Oladinrin, O. T., Jayantha, W. M., & Moses, T. (2021). New Working Practices: A Scientometric Review. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 15(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.11113/intrest.v15n1.8

Issue

Section

Articles